Disney had been sitting in a pennant, and a pennant gives you a measured move. That's the height of the pattern projected out from where price broke, and it's the chart telling you roughly how far this thing should travel if the breakout works. Disney's breakout worked, and it traveled, and then it got to that target and wicked right off it. So I took a fib to it. Mark was sitting at the 13% retracement with a real chance of wicking under, which is not what you want to see. Technically he had another point in him, up around 107. But the closest measured move had already been hit and the wick had already happened, and I would take my money here. Now, a month of time left feels like a reason to hold on to something. It isn't one, and this is where I watch people give it

So I recorded this last night, and it's been sitting there while the Qs gap up this morning. My pick of the week was QQQ. And I'm sure a lot of you are thinking, Voz, why would you pick this? Because yesterday looked awful. We dropped seven points, and there was no news to go lower, nothing at all, and on the 5-minute chart you'd swear we got taken to the woodshed. I picked it bullish anyway. Now, this morning, CPI comes in tame, CoreWeave and Super Micro blow out their numbers, and everybody's got a reason why the Qs are ripping higher. None of that was around last night when I recorded; I just had the pattern on the day chart. It's all in the video: what the pattern is, why it reads bullish instead of broken, and the levels I'm watching from here. One of them already hit

SPY and the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) or Qs as I like to call them…sometimes give me opposite reads. Bullish over here, bearish over there, both at once, and I traded them both. Everybody assumes that can't happen. You get a call setup in SPY, so obviously you've got the same thing in the Qs, because they move together, right? Sometimes the direction's different. The Qs don't own a single bank. Not one. The Nasdaq-100 throws financials out by rule, which means JPMorgan, Bank of America and Wells Fargo are all sitting outside the fund. SPY carries about 14% financials. So on a morning when the banks are ripping and tech is taking a nap, SPY has an engine running that the Qs simply don't have. Those two charts are not going to tell you the same story, and there's nothing mysterious about why. It goes the other way too.